Aceria tuberculata

(Nalepa, 1891) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Trombidiformes/Eriophyidae/Aceria

At a glance

Occurrence records60

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections2

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Aceria tuberculata's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility60 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF60 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 2 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD1 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aceria tuberculata has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type60 records

Wild obs. + sensor53

Museum / vouchered7

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO92 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy6% within 1 km

≤100 m 2≤1 km 1≤10 km 48

51 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor53

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy14% within 1 km

≤1 km 1≤10 km 3>10 km 3

7 georeferenced

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence7

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 1 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Helsinki, FI	7

1 institutions · 7 of 7 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Aceria tuberculata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys2

Countries2

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.9 °C 12.0–13.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.6 °C

Max temp (day)16.2 °C 16.1–16.2

Min temp (night)9.20 °C 7.10–11.2

Precipitation61.0 mm/mo 55.8–66.1

Air humidity59.8 % 59.0–60.7

Moisture balance-43.9 mm/mo -54.7–-33.1

Vapour deficit645 Pa 632–658

Wind speed3.60 m/s 3.20–4.00

Cloud cover47.5 % 43.8–51.2

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)