Accipiter gentilis
(Linnaeus, 1758) · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Accipiter gentilis's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation17 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility206 725 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI70 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics97 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
Paleobiology DatabasePBDB consortiumfossil record↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The northern goshawk (; Accipiter gentilis) is a species of medium-large raptor in the family Accipitridae, a family which also includes other extant diurnal raptors, such as eagles, buzzards and harriers. As a species in the genus Accipiter, the goshawk is often considered a "true hawk". The scientific name is Latin; Accipiter is "hawk", from accipere, "to grasp", and gentilis is "noble" or "gentle" because in the Middle Ages only the nobility were permitted to fly goshawks for falconry. This species was first described by Linnaeus in his Systema naturae in 1758 as Falco gentilis. It is a widespread species that inhabits many of the temperate parts of the Northern Hemisphere. The northern goshawk is the only species in the genus Accipiter found in both Eurasia and North America. It may have the second widest distribution of any true member of the family Accipitridae, behind arguably only the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), which has a broader range to the south of Asia than the goshawk. The only other acciptrid species to also range in both North America and Eurasia according to current opinion, is the more Arctic-restricted rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus). Except in a small portion of southern Asia, it is the only species of "goshawk" in its range and it is thus often referred to, both officially and unofficially, as simply the "goshawk". It is mainly resident, but birds from colder regions migrate south for the winter. In North America, migratory goshawks are often seen migrating south along mountain ridge tops at nearly any time of the fall depending on latitude.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology14
Life cycle & reproduction11
Diet & foraging5
Habitat & environment4
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Accipiter gentilis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Accipiter gentilis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 782×GoaT · Bird Chromosome Database
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Accipiter gentilis. Above itBeside it, each dot is one dated fossil find — few enough to count, so they are drawn individually rather than as a graph. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil. Where the DNA reaches further back than the oldest fossil, the gap is hatched: the ghost lineage. It means the lineage was already out there, but has left us nothing we have dug up yet.
How it livedPBDB
Record type206 740 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions34 of 68 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Stockholm, SE | 855 |
| Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State Universitylocation not on record | 244 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 185 |
| Seattle, US | 89 |
| Saint John, CA | 79 |
| Barcelona, ES | 68 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 67 |
| Tromsø, NO | 63 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 58 |
| Kristiansand, NO | 48 |
| Denver, US | 47 |
| Edmonton, CA | 41 |
| Washington State University, Charles R. Conner Museumlocation not on record | 35 |
| München, DE | 32 |
| Tacoma, US | 32 |
| Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record | 28 |
| Bergen, NO | 27 |
| NSMKlocation not on record | 25 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 23 |
| Central Michigan University Museum of Cultural and Natural Historylocation not on record | 21 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 20 |
| Brussels, BE | 20 |
| Zacatecas, MX | 19 |
| Cambridge, US | 16 |
| Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 16 |
| RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record | 16 |
| University of Nebraska State Museumlocation not on record | 15 |
| Geneva, CH | 14 |
| Natural History Museum, Aarhus Denmarklocation not on record | 13 |
| Albany, US | 12 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 11 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 11 |
| Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 10 |
| Philip L. Wright Zoological Museumlocation not on record | 10 |
| Iowa City, US | 8 |
| Ithaca, US | 7 |
| Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record | 7 |
| Tilburg, NL | 7 |
| US | 6 |
| University of Victorialocation not on record | 6 |
| Frankfurt am Main | 5 |
| SNSDlocation not on record | 4 |
| Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB RASlocation not on record | 4 |
| Paris, FR | 4 |
| Indiana State Universitylocation not on record | 3 |
| Bourges, FR | 3 |
| IMEDEAlocation not on record | 3 |
| STOCKHOLM, SE | 3 |
| Ohio State University - Bird Division, Columbus, OH (OSUM)location not on record | 3 |
| CASlocation not on record | 3 |
| KU Leuvenlocation not on record | 3 |
| Chicago, US | 3 |
| Zografou, GR | 3 |
| University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record | 2 |
| Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record | 2 |
| SMNHTAUlocation not on record | 2 |
| Ugentlocation not on record | 2 |
| Auckland, NZ | 1 |
| California State University, Long Beachlocation not on record | 1 |
| Gifu prefectural Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Los Angeles, US | 1 |
| Sevilla, ES | 1 |
| Bonn, DE | 1 |
| Museo universitario di Scienze della Terra di Romalocation not on record | 1 |
| Banyoles, ES | 1 |
| Delaware Museum of Nature and Sciencelocation not on record | 1 |
| University of Wisconsin, Zoological Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Chicago, US | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Accipiter gentilis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.