Acar plicata (Dillwyn, 1817) (aus Kobelt 1891: Taf. 47 Fig. 5) Acar plicata ist eine Muschel-Art aus der Familie der Archenmuscheln (Arcidae) in der Ordnung der Arcida. Die ursprünglich im Pazifischen und Indischen Ozean einschließlich des Roten Meeres beheimatete Art wanderte in den 1970er durch den Sues-Kanal als Lessepsscher Einwanderer in das östliche Mittelmeer ein. Sie hat sich dort aber nicht etabliert.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acar plicata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens34
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections22
Countries3
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P661 bp consensus6 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 99% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Diversity (π)0.40%
Haplotypes2
BINs0
Most divergent pair0.61%
Where individuals differ — all 6 variable positions, in barcode order
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
07Deep time16–0 Ma
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
Fossil range16–0 Ma Miocene → Holocene
Dated fossil finds29
Most finds around0.25 Ma 17 finds · Pleistocene
StatusStill living record runs to the present
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Acar plicata. Above itBeside it, the bars count how many dated finds fall in each slice of time; the tallest bar is labelled, and heights use a square-root scale so that thin slices stay visible next to rich ones. Read this as how well each stretch of time is preserved and studied — thick bars mean plenty of the right kind of rock and plenty of collectors, which is related to, but not the same as, how common it actually was.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km
≤100 m 25≤1 km 32≤10 km 4>10 km 10
71 georeferenced · 114 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor185
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy73% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 210≤10 km 71>10 km 15
314 georeferenced · 645 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence959
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions17 of 42 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Sydney, AU
220
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
173
Western Australian Museumlocation not on record
32
Philadelphia, US
23
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territorylocation not on record
14
Wellington, NZ
13
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
12
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
11
Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciêncialocation not on record
11
Paris, FR
10
Denver, US
7
Cambridge, US
7
National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korealocation not on record
6
Frankfurt am Main
5
Bando, JP
5
Museums Victorialocation not on record
5
Natick, US
4
National Natural History Collectionslocation not on record
4
University of Floridalocation not on record
4
Washington, US
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
3
Nishinomiya Shell Museumlocation not on record
3
Cantablocation not on record
3
Wakayama Prefectural Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
3
CASlocation not on record
3
Oiso Municipal Museumlocation not on record
3
USPac-SMSlocation not on record
2
KwaZulu-Natal Museumlocation not on record
2
South Kensington, GB
2
MZLUlocation not on record
2
Gifu prefectural Museumlocation not on record
2
The Ohio State University Museum of Biological Diversitylocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Tomioka, JP
1
Toyohashi Museum Of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record
1
Parthenon Tama History Museumlocation not on record
1
Toronto, CA
1
Paleontological Research Institutionlocation not on record
1
Gothenburg, SE
1
Champaign, US
1
Helsinki, FI
1
42 institutions · 609 of 959 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA22 detections
Where the DNA of Acar plicata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found22
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 22 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.