Acanthochitona rhodea is een keverslakkensoort uit de familie van de Acanthochitonidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort werd in 1893 voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd door Henry Augustus Pilsbry.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acanthochitona rhodea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections2
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P18S-3P
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type97 records
Wild obs. + sensor4
Museum / vouchered93
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO164 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit19
200–1000 m twilight0
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 1.2 m · max 15.5 m · 19 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 2
3 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy56% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 32≤10 km 24>10 km 3
61 georeferenced · 32 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence93
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions4 of 10 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
CASlocation not on record
29
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
9
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
4
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
3
Philadelphia, US
2
Washington, US
2
Cambridge, US
1
Natural History Museum of Utahlocation not on record
1
Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Museumlocation not on record
1
Brussels, BE
1
10 institutions · 53 of 93 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Acanthochitona rhodea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median24.8 °C 24.8–24.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter1.90 °C
Max temp (day)27.5 °C
Min temp (night)22.2 °C
Precipitation235 mm/mo
Air humidity66.1 %
Moisture balance90.7 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,057 Pa
Wind speed0.8 m/s
Cloud cover16.9 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
