Acanthis flammea
(Linnaeus, 1758) · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Acanthis flammea's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation15 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 623 209 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI109 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics163 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
IOC World Bird ListIOCbird checklist↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The common redpoll or mealy redpoll (Acanthis flammea) is a species of bird in the finch family. It breeds somewhat further south than the Arctic redpoll, also in habitats with thickets or shrubs.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology13
Life cycle & reproduction11
Diet & foraging6
Habitat & environment4
Physiology & chemistry1
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acanthis flammea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
The complete instruction manual Acanthis flammea carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 782×GoaT · Bird Chromosome Database
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type2 623 209 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions31 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 897 |
| Helsinki, FI | 493 |
| Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State Universitylocation not on record | 217 |
| Seattle, US | 178 |
| Denver, US | 157 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 153 |
| Stockholm, SE | 141 |
| Oulu, FI | 130 |
| Kuopio, FI | 115 |
| Iowa City, US | 86 |
| Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record | 53 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 51 |
| NHMOlocation not on record | 48 |
| Albany, US | 48 |
| Washington State University, Charles R. Conner Museumlocation not on record | 47 |
| Chicago, US | 42 |
| Tacoma, US | 39 |
| Philip L. Wright Zoological Museumlocation not on record | 39 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 34 |
| Auckland, NZ | 32 |
| New Haven, US | 23 |
| Bergen, NO | 20 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 18 |
| Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 16 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 15 |
| Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 12 |
| Brussels, BE | 12 |
| Cambridge, US | 11 |
| Ohio State University - Bird Division, Columbus, OH (OSUM)location not on record | 11 |
| Frankfurt am Main | 10 |
| RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record | 10 |
| Geneva, CH | 8 |
| Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB RASlocation not on record | 7 |
| München, DE | 7 |
| US | 7 |
| Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record | 6 |
| Saint John, CA | 6 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 6 |
| Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record | 6 |
| Natick, US | 5 |
| Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record | 5 |
| Sydney, AU | 4 |
| Ithaca, US | 4 |
| Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record | 3 |
| Natural History Museum, Aarhus Denmarklocation not on record | 3 |
| KU Leuvenlocation not on record | 2 |
| Moore Laboratory of Zoology, Occidental Collegelocation not on record | 2 |
| Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record | 2 |
| Los Angeles, US | 2 |
| Forssa, FI | 2 |
| TMPMlocation not on record | 2 |
| Chicago, US | 2 |
| Gothenburg, SE | 1 |
| NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record | 1 |
| SNSDlocation not on record | 1 |
| ZMAAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 1 |
| QVMAGlocation not on record | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Acanthis flammea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.