Acanthaclisis occitanica is een insect uit de familie van de mierenleeuwen (Myrmeleontidae), die tot de orde netvleugeligen (Neuroptera) behoort. Acanthaclisis occitanica is voor het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door de Villers in 1789.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acanthaclisis occitanica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
BINs2
Marker genes2
eDNA detections6
Countries1
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P632 bp consensus3 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 92% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 50 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)5.3%
Haplotypes3
BINs2
Most divergent pair7.6%
Other
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-3P★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type378 records
Wild obs. + sensor297
Museum / vouchered40
Other41
Origin
Native3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 160 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy73% within 1 km
≤100 m 84≤1 km 43≤10 km 25>10 km 22
174 georeferenced · 123 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor297
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 1
2 georeferenced · 38 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence40
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions1 of 3 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
7
Washington, US
2
CIBIOlocation not on record
1
3 institutions · 10 of 40 vouchered records shown · 28 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Acanthaclisis occitanica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median22.0 °C 22.0–22.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.8 °C
Max temp (day)27.6 °C
Min temp (night)13.9 °C
Precipitation5.50 mm/mo
Air humidity39.8 %
Moisture balance-124 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,940 Pa
Wind speed2.40 m/s
Cloud cover21.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
